7Block Labs
Decentralized Finance

ByAUJay

Hierarchical Multisig for DAO Governance and Treasury Guardrails

Summary: Hierarchical multisig replaces “one-size-fits-all” approvals with layered, purpose‑built controls—combining security councils, timelocks, role‑based modules, and spending limits. This guide shows how top DAOs implement it today, what to copy, what to avoid, and how to deploy practical guardrails with Safe, Zodiac, and OpenZeppelin.


Why hierarchical multisig now

A flat M‑of‑N multisig concentrates all powers into one threshold. That’s easy to operate—but brittle. A hierarchical design decomposes authority into tiers with different signers, thresholds, delays, and scopes. The result: faster incident response without giving a single group carte blanche, enforceable exit windows for users, and auditable operational boundaries for teams and vendors.

You’ve seen this pattern emerge across leading ecosystems (Optimism, Arbitrum, Base, Linea) and blue‑chip protocols (Maker, Compound, Aave) as they formalize “security councils,” emergency guardians, and budget modules rather than relying on one mega‑multisig. (forum.l2beat.com)


What “hierarchical multisig” means in practice

  • Multisig‑of‑multisigs (nesting)
  • Multiple thresholds for different actions (e.g., instant emergency patch vs. delayed upgrades)
  • Role‑scoped keys (e.g., guardian pause only; no asset movement)
  • Guard modules that can veto or validate specific transactions
  • Timelocks that create predictable “exit windows”
  • Spending‑limit modules for controlled, signer‑less outflows

This is not theory. Below are concrete, production patterns you can adopt.


Pattern 1: Nested multisig for upgrades (Optimism’s 2‑of‑2)

Optimism’s OP Stack upgrades use a top‑level 2‑of‑2 multisig. Each “2” is itself a multisig: a 10‑of‑13 Security Council and a 5‑of‑7 Foundation multisig. Either sub‑multisig can veto; both must approve to execute. This structure enables fast incident response while retaining dual‑party checks. (docs.optimism.io)

Optimism also documents delayed upgrades: protocol upgrades and specific designation changes are subject to a 14‑day delay—clear, public guardrails that create a user exit window. (gov.optimism.io)

How to copy:

  • Put emergency and routine powers behind different sub‑multisigs.
  • Require cross‑institutional approval (two distinct entities at the top).
  • Standardize delays for non‑emergencies (≥14 days is common for L2 core changes).

Pattern 2: Dual councils + staged delays (Arbitrum)

Arbitrum historically ran two security multisigs with identical members but different powers: a 9/12 with instant upgrade authority and a 7/12 behind a multi‑day delay (later moved toward 9/12 to meet L2BEAT’s thresholds). This demonstrates a clean split between “break‑glass emergency” and “slow path” upgrades, with explicit exit windows for users. (forum.arbitrum.foundation)

Operational maturity also includes rotating membership via public elections (e.g., the March–May 2025 election with defined phases and decaying voting weights to incentivize timely participation). Bake elections and rotation into your council charter from day one. (forum.arbitrum.foundation)


Pattern 3: Security council quorum at Stage‑1 standards (Base)

Base reached Stage‑1 decentralization with a council that includes Coinbase, Optimism, and 10 independent entities, requiring ≥75% quorum (9/12) for upgrades. Stage‑1 explicitly expects at least eight participants and a 75% threshold to ensure that no single operator can unilaterally push invalid state or block exits without broad collusion. (docs.base.org)

Key takeaway: design to meet Stage‑1 requirements up front—your governance narrative, risk disclosures, and vendor diligence become simpler. (forum.l2beat.com)


Pattern 4: Security council + default timelock (Linea)

Linea’s roadmap established a 9‑of‑12 Security Council with a default 7‑day timelock for upgrades, with a narrowly scoped override for severe vulnerabilities—precisely the “emergency vs. standard” split you want. (community.linea.build)


Pattern 5: Treasury guardrails via timelocks and guardians (Maker, Compound, Aave, Angle, Seamless)

  • Maker’s Governance Security Module (GSM) enforces a network‑wide pause delay (recently adjusted by executive votes: e.g., decreased from 30h to 16h in July 2024; set to 30h again by Feb 6, 2025). These changes are public, parameterized, and auditable—good practice for any DAO. (vote.makerdao.com)
  • Compound pioneered the “Pause Guardian”: strictly limited to disabling mint/borrow/transfer/liquidate; cannot unpause or move funds. Authority is held by a community multisig—tightly scoped, high‑impact emergency power. (docs.compound.finance)
  • Aave executes via Short and Long Executors (1‑day vs 7‑day timelock) and is trialing risk oracles and automated freeze guardians for sensitive assets (e.g., USDe). Guardrails adapt to asset‑level risk rather than using one global switch. (aave.org)
  • Angle and Seamless split powers into “Governance Guardian” and “Protocol Guardian,” each behind a multisig and constrained to veto/pause, not unilateral upgrades—model language you can borrow for role definition. (docs.angle.money)

Turning patterns into a deployable architecture

Below is a reference architecture we deploy for clients using Safe, Zodiac, and OpenZeppelin. It’s opinionated, testable, and easy to audit.

1) Core account and upgrade path

  • Safe A (Protocol Admin) is a nested multisig: 2‑of‑2 where each branch is a separate Safe:
    • Safe B: Security Council (e.g., 10‑of‑13)
    • Safe C: Foundation/Company (e.g., 5‑of‑7)
  • Upgrades require both B and C; emergency patch path is gated by B only but must be time‑boxed (e.g., temporary guardian ownership for ≤72h) with an automatic reversion transaction queued in the timelock. (docs.optimism.io)

2) Timelocks

  • OZ TimelockController with:
    • Short queue (24–48h) for routine parameter changes
    • Long queue (≥7d) for core/bridge/pause‑delay changes
  • Publicly document current delays and include “office hours” windows for execution predictability (Maker does this). (vote.makerdao.com)

3) Guardians (strictly scoped)

  • ProtocolGuardian (multisig) may only:
    • call pause/freeze functions
    • reduce caps/LTVs
  • GovernanceGuardian (multisig) may veto within timelock, not execute arbitrary actions. Copy Compound’s “cannot unpause” ethos to avoid silent privilege creep. (docs.compound.finance)

4) Execution guardrails on the Safe

  • Install a Transaction Guard to validate every tx before execution:
    • disallow “unknown recipients”
    • enforce per‑tx and 24‑hour spend caps
    • require reference IDs in calldata for finance ops
  • Use Safe’s Module Guard for module‑originated calls; broken guards can DoS, so add a pre‑agreed “break glass” uninstall path controlled by both B and C. (docs.safe.global)

5) Role‑based modules (Zodiac)

  • Roles Modifier to bind callable selectors and parameter ranges to roles (e.g., RiskOps can only adjust caps within narrow bounds, not upgrade logic). (zodiac.wiki)
  • Reality (SafeSnap) module to execute Snapshot outcomes after oracle resolution with bonds/cooldowns; require long enough questionTimeout (≥48h) and high minimumBond. Monitor
    ProposalQuestionCreated
    and enable emergency invalidation if needed. (zodiac.wiki)

6) Spending guardrails for the treasury

  • Safe Allowance Module (“Spending Limits”) for signer‑less disbursements:
    • periodic caps per token per beneficiary
    • reset schedules (daily/weekly/monthly) for ops expenses
  • Model departmental budgets with hierarchical sub‑allowances via Firm’s Budget module—great for nested cost centers (e.g., “Engineering → Grants → Bounties”). (help.safe.global)

7) Monitoring, approvals, and automation

  • OpenZeppelin Defender:
    • Approval Processes that wrap multisigs, relayers, timelocks, and governor contracts for consistent “who signed what” trails
    • Relayer Groups for redundant, rate‑limited transaction submission, with throughput guidance (≤50 tx/min per relayer) and enterprise notifications (Slack, PagerDuty, OpsGenie) on anomalies
    • Access Control dashboards to track owner/role drift across chains and enforce “multisig or DAO owns admins” as a policy (docs.openzeppelin.com)

Concrete configurations we recommend

Below are battle‑tested setups with numeric thresholds and delays you can adopt or adapt.

L2 protocol (Stage‑1‑ready)

  • Security Council: 10‑of‑13 multisig; public membership policy; elections every 6–12 months
  • Foundation/Company: 5‑of‑7 multisig
  • Upgrade multisig: 2‑of‑2 (Council + Foundation)
  • Delays:
    • Emergency patch: Council‑only, 0 delay, time‑boxed; requires post‑mortem and rollback plan in the same batch
    • Standard upgrade: 14 days
    • Bridge/withdrawal logic: 14 days minimum
  • Exit guarantees: document a ≥7‑day exit window for any upgrade not on the emergency track (aligns with L2BEAT Stage‑1). (forum.l2beat.com)

DeFi lending protocol

  • Governors:
    • Short Executor: 24–48h for caps/IRM tweaks
    • Long Executor: 7d for governance core
  • Guardians:
    • Pause Guardian: can only pause select functions; cannot unpause; expires or rotates quarterly
    • Risk Guardian: bounded caps/LTV reductions only
  • Sentinel monitors:
    • Emitted events for role grants/revokes
    • Large outbound transfers
    • New module/guard enabled on any Safe
  • Treasury:
    • Allowances: ops wallets 20k USDC/day; market‑makers 100k USDC/week; all beneficiaries whitelisted by Roles Modifier
    • Quarterly “cliff” disbursement with timelock → downstream Safe to minimize large balances idling in the root treasury
  • Reference: Compound’s Pause Guardian pattern; Aave’s dual executors; Angle/Seamless guardian split. (docs.compound.finance)

DAO grants program

  • Snapshot → Reality → Safe execution:
    • questionTimeout
      : 72h
    • minimumBond
      : set to deter spam (calibrate vs. token price)
    • cooldown
      : 24h before execution
  • Spending Limits:
    • Evaluators: 2k USDC/day/person
    • Program Lead: 20k USDC/week
  • Transaction Guard rules:
    • require
      memo
      string in calldata
    • block new recipients unless on an allowlist managed by a role holder (not a signer)
  • Monitoring: alert on new Reality proposals and allowance overuse; Defender approval workflows for monthly top‑ups. (zodiac.wiki)

TSS/MPC vs on‑chain multisig: when and how to combine

  • On‑chain multisig (e.g., Safe) is transparent, composable with modules, and chain‑enforceable. It’s ideal for governance and treasuries needing programmable guardrails and public auditability.
  • Threshold Signatures (TSS/MPC) keep approvals off‑chain and produce a single normal signature on‑chain. Benefits: smaller transactions, privacy of signer set, and broad multi‑chain support—especially useful for centralized teams or custodial flows. Vendors like Blockdaemon and Fireblocks expose policy engines, step‑up approvals, and integrations with compliance tooling. (blockdaemon.com)

Recommendation: use MPC/TSS for operational wallets that need high throughput and exchange integrations; hold protocol keys and DAO treasuries in on‑chain multisigs with modules, timelocks, and guards. If you must mix, route MPC‑controlled keys into the signer sets of your on‑chain multisigs, not the other way around.


Standards and modules that make this work

  • Safe Modules and Guards: add/remove via Safe transactions; treat guards as code that can brick your Safe—establish recovery. (docs.safe.global)
  • Safe Allowance Module: signer‑less periodic spending for specific addresses and tokens; available in Safe Wallet UI. (help.safe.global)
  • Reality (SafeSnap) for Snapshot execution with bonds/cooldowns; monitor events; set escalation paths. (zodiac.wiki)
  • ERC‑1271: contracts signing off‑chain messages—critical for DEX off‑chain orders and DAO attestations from smart‑account treasuries. (eips.ethereum.org)

Emerging best practices (2025)

  • Design to L2BEAT Stage‑1: ≥8 council members, ≥75% threshold, ≥7‑day exit for standard upgrades. Your decentralization story and exchange listings benefit from clear, recognized milestones. (forum.l2beat.com)
  • Separate emergency and standard powers, with explicit expirations and post‑incident reviews.
  • Forbid risky UI features at scale. For example, Optimism disallows Safe’s “proposer” feature for council multisigs to reduce signer confusion. Document such bans in your charter. (gov.optimism.io)
  • Publish a signer rotation schedule and liveness checks (e.g., quarterly sign‑message attestations)—Base documents cohort terms and liveness. (docs.base.org)
  • Budget like a company: encode departments and sub‑allowances on‑chain; prefer periodic limits over large, ad‑hoc transfers. (docs.firm.org)
  • Configure Defender Approval Processes to standardize how upgrades, deployments, and large transfers flow through your org (works with multisigs, timelocks, governors, and even Fireblocks). (docs.openzeppelin.com)

Implementation checklist (copy/paste for your RFC)

  • Governance structure
    • Security Council: X‑of‑Y, public roster, rotation cadence
    • Foundation/Company multisig: M‑of‑N
    • Top‑level upgrade key: 2‑of‑2 (Council + Foundation)
    • Emergency path: Council‑only, 0 delay, max duration, forced rollback tx queued
  • Timelocks and exits
    • Short: 24–48h; Long: ≥7d; office hours defined
    • Exit window documented for all standard upgrades
  • Roles and guardians
    • ProtocolGuardian (pause‑only)
    • GovernanceGuardian (timelock veto‑only)
    • Roles Modifier bounds for param changes
  • Safe modules and guards
    • Transaction Guard with allowlists, spend caps, memo enforcement
    • Module Guard installed; recovery path documented
    • Allowance Module configured per team/beneficiary
    • Reality module with
      questionTimeout
      ,
      minimumBond
      ,
      cooldown
  • Monitoring and ops
    • Defender Approval Processes for upgrades/transfers
    • Relayer Groups capacity sized (≤50 tx/min per relayer)
    • Notifications (Slack/PagerDuty/OpsGenie) wired
    • Quarterly liveness checks and key rotation drills

References for each box: Optimism/Arbitrum/Base/Linea docs for structure; Compound/Aave/Maker for guardians/timelocks; Safe/Zodiac for modules/guards; OpenZeppelin Defender for approvals/relayers. (docs.optimism.io)


Pitfalls we keep seeing (avoid these)

  • One mega‑multisig for everything. Split powers. If a signer is compromised, your blast radius is contained.
  • No timelock on parameter changes. A 24–48h queue plus notifications catches fat‑finger errors before they bite.
  • Unlimited guardian authority. Give guardians one‑way powers (pause, reduce limits) and require governance to restore.
  • Unmonitored modules/guards. Treat “module added/removed” as a P1 alert; prevent silent privilege escalation. (docs.openzeppelin.com)
  • No exit window communication. If you adjust delays (like Maker’s GSM), announce clearly with effective dates and links to the on‑chain spell. (vote.makerdao.com)

A note on other ecosystems and inspiration

Hierarchical safety nets show up outside EVM too. For example, the Liquid Bitcoin federation uses 11‑of‑15 multisig with timelocked emergency keys for network recovery—illustrating how timelocks provide slow‑moving, last‑resort guardrails without undermining day‑to‑day multisig authority. Use this mental model when designing your own “emergency but bounded” flows. (help.blockstream.com)


Where to go from here

  • If you’re an L2 or high‑TVL protocol, blueprint against Stage‑1 today; many buyers (exchanges, institutions) are using it as a de facto rubric. (forum.l2beat.com)
  • If you’re a product DAO, start with Reality + Allowance Module + Transaction Guard. It gets you real decentralization (community execution and capped spend) without operational drag. (zodiac.wiki)
  • For enterprise‑grade ops wallets, combine Defender approvals with MPC custody—but keep protocol keys and treasuries in on‑chain multisigs with modules and timelocks. (docs.openzeppelin.com)

7Block Labs routinely implements these architectures end‑to‑end: charter drafting, signer onboarding, Safe/Zodiac module installs, Delay/Reality configurations, Defender workflows, and red‑team tabletop drills. If you want a working, audited setup—not just a diagram—we can help.

Like what you're reading? Let's build together.

Get a free 30‑minute consultation with our engineering team.

Related Posts

7BlockLabs

Full-stack blockchain product studio: DeFi, dApps, audits, integrations.

7Block Labs is a trading name of JAYANTH TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED.

Registered in England and Wales (Company No. 16589283).

Registered Office address: Office 13536, 182-184 High Street North, East Ham, London, E6 2JA.

© 2025 7BlockLabs. All rights reserved.