Summary: Decision-makers can use this practical RFP template to evaluate blockchain wallets purpose‑built for supply chain and trade finance. It includes precise, 2025‑ready requirements covering legal enforceability (eBL/MLETR), ERP/EPCIS/W3C VC integrations, account‑abstraction security, ISO 20022 payment ops, sanctions/Travel Rule tooling, and enterprise controls.

RFP Template for Blockchain Wallets Used in Supply Chain and Trade Finance

As of late 2025, the “enterprise wallet” is no longer just a key store. It’s your firm’s gateway to electronic bills of lading (eBL), digital product passports, documentary credits under eUCP, ISO 20022 payment rails, and on‑chain settlement—plus a long list of security, compliance, and audit requirements. This template from 7Block Labs collects what we’ve learned implementing wallets at scale for logistics, manufacturers, banks, and fintechs—so you can run a fast, apples‑to‑apples procurement and avoid costly gaps. (dcsa.org)

1) Executive intent and scope

State your business goals and where the wallet fits in:

Initial use cases: eBL issuance/transfer; tokenized documents of title; collateralized inventory; letters of credit under eUCP 2.1; bank guarantees and URDTT‑governed digital trade transactions; supplier payments and collections. (2go.iccwbo.org)
Jurisdictions and legal basis: confirm enforceability via MLETR‑style laws (e.g., UK Electronic Trade Documents Act 2023; Singapore ETA 2021) and U.S. Article 12 (controllable electronic records) where relevant. (legislation.gov.uk)
Target networks and docs: DCSA‑standard eBL with cross‑platform interoperability (PINT API, MSPIA legal framework, Control‑Tracking‑Registry); EPCIS 2.0 event streams for traceability; W3C Verifiable Credentials (VC) 2.0 for identity and document attestations. (dcsa.org)

Deliverables: pilot in 12 weeks with production cutover and success metrics (cycle time, rejection rate, capex/opex).

2) Legal and regulatory alignment

Ask vendors to prove legal fitness “out of the box”:

eDocuments enforceability
- Show how the wallet represents “control”/possession for electronic trade documents and supports conversion between paper and electronic per ETDA 2023 Sections 2–4. Provide architecture notes on “reliable systems” criteria. (legislation.gov.uk)
- Confirm compatibility with jurisdictions adopting MLETR or equivalents (Bahrain, Singapore, UK; plus other adoptions in 2024–2025). (uncitral.un.org)
- For U.S. operations, detail how CERs under the 2022 UCC Amendments (Article 12) are handled; include status tracking for states (e.g., DC enacted; New York enacted Dec 5, 2025). (code.dccouncil.gov)
Trade rules support
- eUCP 2.1 for electronic presentation under L/Cs; eURC 1.1 alignment; URDTT 1.0 for fully digital trade transactions. Provide data model mappings and validation rules. (2go.iccwbo.org)
AML/Travel Rule and sanctions
- Describe native integration with Travel Rule workflows for VASP‑to‑VASP transfers and adapted procedures when interacting with unhosted wallets; include counterparty VASP due diligence. (fatf-gafi.org)
- Sanctions screening: on‑chain and API screening (e.g., Chainalysis Oracle/API), alerting, and audit trails; support for multi‑chain holistic screening (TRM, Elliptic) and periodic list refresh. (go.chainalysis.com)

3) Wallet architecture and key management

Pin down your cryptography and ops expectations:

Custody model
- MPC/TSS capability (e.g., one‑round MPC protocols, key‑share refresh, cold‑co‑signing) with evidence of peer review and open‑source references. Require details on policy controls at signing time. (fireblocks.com)
- HSM options with FIPS 140‑3 validated modules; list certificate numbers and levels; explain secure enclave options if HSM not used. (csrc.nist.gov)
Enterprise policy engine
- Risk‑aware policy checks at pre‑sign: beneficiary allowlists, value/time/risk thresholds, doc‑state checks (e.g., eBL transfer permitted state), geofencing, and sanctions attestations.
- Segregation of duties and 4‑eyes approvals; just‑in‑time elevation; emergency “break glass” with immutable audit.
Account abstraction (Ethereum/EVM)
- Support for ERC‑4337 (EntryPoint v0.8) and EIP‑7702 transactions; document how you mitigate phishing/over‑delegation risks in 7702 authorizations, with configurable UX interlocks and telemetry. (etherspot.io)
- Safe (formerly Gnosis Safe) compatibility and modules for ERC‑4337 where required. (safe.global)
Privacy and selective disclosure
- Compatibility with privacy‑preserving L2s and zk‑based workflows (e.g., EY Nightfall_4) for private B2B settlement while retaining auditability. (ey.com)

4) Document and data standards

Your wallet has to “speak” the language of trade and supply chains:

eBL interoperability
- Demonstrate end‑to‑end flows using DCSA PINT APIs, MSPIA legal framework, and CTR for control tracking across platforms; evidence of successful tests or customers. (dcsa.org)
- Cite provider ecosystem readiness given 2024–2025 adoption data (e.g., nearly half of survey respondents now use eBL in some capacity). (iccwbo.org)
GS1 EPCIS 2.0
- Native JSON/JSON‑LD event capture/queries; EPCIS 2.0 vocabularies; sensor/IoT data; REST APIs; Digital Link URI support. Ask for DSCSA‑oriented EPCIS conformance (e.g., GS1 US trustmarks) if operating in pharma. (gs1.org)
W3C Verifiable Credentials 2.0
- Support issuance/verification of VC‑based identities (trader IDs, facility credentials, eBL holder proofs); status lists; JOSE/COSE and Data Integrity cryptosuites now at W3C Recommendation (May 15, 2025). (w3.org)
ISO 20022 payments and reconciliation
- For fiat legs: native mapping to CBPR+ messages (pacs.008/009) as MT coexistence ends Nov 22, 2025; inbound reconciliation via camt.*; data retention of payment IDs for dispute resolution. (swift.com)

5) Integration with your stack (ERP, TMS, banks, platforms)

Ask vendors to prove they won’t strand your core systems:

ERP/TMS adapters
- SAP S/4HANA and Oracle adapters; event bus/Kafka patterns; idempotent webhooks for doc state changes (eBL endorsed, guarantee called, L/C presented).
Banking
- ISO 20022 connectivity (FINplus/host‑to‑host) with validation of structured addresses and end‑to‑end references; show test plans for the Nov 2025 cutover. (swift.com)
Trade platforms
- Prebuilt connectors to DCSA‑aligned eBL platforms and banking portals; evidence of URDTT/eUCP data mapping.
Analytics and SIEM
- Structured logs (policy decisions, Travel Rule payloads, sanctions decisions, 4337/7702 telemetry) to your SIEM with privacy filtering.

6) Security, compliance, and resilience

Demand third‑party verifications and concrete SLOs:

Certifications and audits
- SOC 2 Type II and ISO/IEC 27001:2022 (note: 2022 edition consolidates controls to 93 across four themes). Provide reports and scope; name the auditor. (coinbase.com)
- Crypto module validations (FIPS 140‑3) and pen‑test cadence; SBOMs and supply‑chain controls. (csrc.nist.gov)
Operational security
- Transaction simulation and policy dry‑run; dual control on policy changes; air‑gapped recovery of MPC/HSM shares.
- Business continuity: RPO/RTO by region; disaster drills; incident response 24/7 with defined MTTR.
Compliance tooling
- Chain analytics integrations (Chainalysis/TRM/Elliptic) for pre‑ and post‑trade monitoring; thresholds for blocking vs. escalate‑and‑allow. (chainalysis.com)

7) Governance, auditability, and data retention

Immutable audit trails linking: signer identities (VCs), policy versions, doc hashes, sanctions decisions, and payment IDs.
Retention schedules aligned to URDTT/eUCP and local regs; export in human‑readable and machine formats.

8) User experience and risk‑aware design

Role‑specific UIs (trade ops, treasury, compliance).
Guardrails for account abstraction
- Explicit 7702 delegation reviews (who, what, where, time‑boxed); high‑friction prompts for permission‑escalating transactions; bundler/paymaster visibility for ERC‑4337 paths. (etherspot.io)
Contextual prompts in trade flows (e.g., warn if endorsing eBL without bank consent or outside URDTT terms).

9) Performance, SLAs, and support

Throughput and latency targets for:
- eBL transfer confirmations; ISO 20022 payment acknowledgements; MPC signing latency; sanctions API response times (<300 ms typical for leading services). (trmlabs.com)
Uptime SLAs, regional support, and escalation paths.

10) Commercials

Pricing transparency across: core wallet licenses, policy engine, connectors (eBL, ISO 20022, EPCIS, VASP Travel Rule), analytics, HSM/MPC infrastructure, and per‑transaction fees.
Volume tiers; sandboxes and pilot credits.

11) Vendor viability

References in your vertical and region; proof of production with DCSA‑interoperable eBLs and ISO 20022 rails.
Financial stability, roadmap, open‑source posture (e.g., MPC protocol references), and dependency disclosures.

12) Evaluation matrix (example)

Score on a 100‑point rubric:

Legal enforceability (MLETR/ETDA/UCC12/URDTT/eUCP) – 15
Security and compliance (FIPS/SOC2/ISO27001 + sanctions/Travel Rule) – 20
Standards and interoperability (DCSA PINT/MSPIA/CTR; EPCIS 2.0; VC 2.0; ISO 20022) – 20
Architecture and safety (MPC/HSM; 4337/7702 controls; privacy L2) – 15
Integrations (ERP/TMS/banks/platforms/SIEM) – 15
SLAs, support, TCO – 15

Practical examples you can lift into your RFP

eBL collateralization pilot (12 weeks)

Objective: Move from couriered paper BLs to DCSA‑standard eBLs as pledgeable collateral with on‑chain escrow.
Scope:
- Wallet must endorse and transfer eBL across two different platforms via PINT API, with CTR‑tracked control changes and MSPIA‑compliant terms. (dcsa.org)
- Sanctions/Travel Rule checks before each endorsement; auto‑attach sanctions attestations to the transaction record. (fatf-gafi.org)
- If financed, trigger ISO 20022 pacs.008 to banking partner; store end‑to‑end IDs for reconciliation. (swift.com)
KPIs: average endorsement time; discrepancy/return rate; payment STP rate on CBPR+.

DSCSA/EPCIS pharma traceability wallet

Objective: Sign and anchor EPCIS 2.0 events and attach VC‑based facility credentials for authenticated event provenance.
Scope:
- EPCIS 2.0 capture/query; align with GS1 US DSCSA guidelines and conformance testing (Release 1.2/1.3 sunrise). (gs1us.org)
- VC 2.0 credentials for manufacturer/wholesaler/dispenser identities; status lists for credential revocation. (w3.org)
- Handle FDA stabilization/exemption timelines in 2024–2026 for phased go‑live. (fda.gov)
KPIs: event acceptance rate; investigation cycle time for suspect product; audit pass rate.

Digital L/C under eUCP 2.1 with URDTT data backbone

Objective: Present electronic records under an L/C, then settle trade via on‑chain escrow and ISO 20022 payout.
Scope:
- Wallet constructs eUCP‑compliant presentation; applies URDTT data structures; immutably logs examination/notice of refusal if any. (2go.iccwbo.org)
- Privacy: where counterparties require confidentiality on amounts or counterparties, route settlement via zk rollup (e.g., Nightfall_4) while preserving audit proofs. (ey.com)

2025 emerging requirements to include

eBL reality check: adoption is accelerating but uneven. FIT Alliance’s 2024 survey shows 49% of respondents now use eBLs in some capacity; bulk sector campaigns hit 25%+ for iron ore eBLs, while banks still lag—so wallets must bridge mixed paper/electronic environments. (iccwbo.org)
ISO 20022 cutover: cross‑border payment instruction coexistence ends on Nov 22, 2025—wallets touching fiat legs must be CBPR+‑ready or risk rejects/fees. (swift.com)
VC 2.0 is standard: the W3C finalized the Verifiable Credentials 2.0 family in May 2025, enabling interoperable, privacy‑respecting credentials across supply chains—bake this into identity and doc‑signing. (w3.org)
U.S. commercial law: 2022 UCC Amendments (Article 12) continue rolling out (e.g., DC, New York), clarifying perfection by “control” for digital assets and e‑notes; align wallet evidence and audit trails accordingly. (code.dccouncil.gov)
Account abstraction safety: if you plan to exploit ERC‑4337/7702 for better UX, require extra authorization UX, whitelisting, and telemetry to mitigate delegation abuse. (etherspot.io)

Sample RFP questions (copy/paste)

Legal
- Which jurisdictions’ MLETR‑style statutes have you successfully supported in production? Provide client attestations for UK ETDA 2023 and Singapore ETA 2021. (legislation.gov.uk)
Standards
- Show an end‑to‑end DCSA eBL transfer between two platform providers using PINT, with CTR control updates and MSPIA terms. Include logs and timing. (dcsa.org)
- Provide EPCIS 2.0 conformance evidence and DSCSA readiness (e.g., GS1 US trustmarks or partner listings). (gs1us.org)
- Demonstrate VC 2.0 issuance/verification with revocation (Bitstring Status List) and JOSE/COSE proof suites. (w3.org)
Payments
- Provide message samples (pacs.008/009/camt.053) and your plan for the Nov 2025 CBPR+ end‑of‑coexistence. (swift.com)
Security
- List FIPS 140‑3 certificate IDs used and scope; SOC 2 Type II coverage; ISO/IEC 27001:2022 SoA. (csrc.nist.gov)
- Describe your ERC‑4337/7702 risk controls (authorization scoping, session limits, human‑readable prompts, kill‑switch). (etherspot.io)
Compliance
- Which sanctions and wallet‑screening providers are natively supported (Chainalysis Oracle/API, TRM, Elliptic)? Provide average response times and audit exports. (go.chainalysis.com)

Minimum acceptance criteria (MAC)

Legal: ETDA‑compliant control semantics; URDTT/eUCP data structures; Article 12 control evidence.
Security: FIPS 140‑3 validated cryptographic modules; SOC 2 Type II; ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification in scope; quarterly pen‑tests. (csrc.nist.gov)
Standards: DCSA eBL interoperability; EPCIS 2.0 capture/query; VC 2.0; CBPR+ messaging. (dcsa.org)
Compliance: Travel Rule workflows; sanctions screening with on‑chain and API options; immutable logs. (fatf-gafi.org)
AA Safety: ERC‑4337 and EIP‑7702 supported with policy‑level controls. (etherspot.io)

Buyer tips from recent programs

Budget realistically for DPP/DCSA/EPCIS programs: teams underestimate data plumbing and identity. The EU’s ESPR/Digital Product Passport workplan is live with 2026–2030 phased mandates—wallets that can attach VCs to product passports and sign EPCIS events reduce rework later. (sustainable-markets.com)
Expect hybrid phases: eBL adoption is moving fast (49% using in some capacity), but many banks and corridors remain paper‑heavy. Pick wallets that can reference both electronic and paper equivalents during transitions, and that implement DCSA’s cross‑platform controls to avoid lock‑in. (iccwbo.org)
Payments migration is not optional: if your wallet triggers or reconciles fiat legs, ensure CBPR+ readiness before the November 2025 deadline to prevent NAKs/fees. (swift.com)

Final checklist (short version)

ETDA/MLETR/UCC12 enforceability and evidence package. (legislation.gov.uk)
DCSA eBL interoperability (PINT/MSPIA/CTR) demo + logs. (dcsa.org)
EPCIS 2.0 + DSCSA conformance plan; VC 2.0 support. (gs1.org)
ISO 20022 (CBPR+) messages and testing plan for Nov 2025. (swift.com)
Sanctions/Travel Rule integrations (Chainalysis/TRM/Elliptic) with audit. (fatf-gafi.org)
MPC/HSM design; FIPS 140‑3; SOC 2 Type II; ISO 27001:2022. (csrc.nist.gov)
ERC‑4337/EIP‑7702 with anti‑phishing/over‑delegation controls. (etherspot.io)
ZK privacy option (e.g., Nightfall_4) where needed. (ey.com)

If you’d like a scorecard spreadsheet and sample clauses we use at 7Block Labs, tell us your top use case (eBL finance, DSCSA traceability, digital L/C, DPP) and we’ll tailor the matrix and pilot plan in under a week.